|
|
Is Social Network Automation Spam?06.01.09 at 2:45 pm by Mark ShipleyOne of the biggest complaints I hear about social media platforms like LinkedIn, Plaxo, Facebook and Twitter is the amount of spam on the network. As a person with a high sensitivity to both internal and external distractions, this unwanted din makes it very difficult to listen carefully to the conversation. Over the past year, I have been experimenting with some of the automation tools to reduce the amount of time I spend starting conversations so I can direct more time listening and responding to the conversations of others. Under certain circumstances, I would whole-heartedly agree. However, I believe with proper thought and care, these automation tools can help cut down on the spam I create and focus my attention on being a meaningful participant in the conversation. Is this spam?
I suppose if I set these automation tools to randomly spit out alerts, the answer would be yes. Or if my posts and comments were on subjects not of interest to my followers, again yes it would be spam. But now that I am using these automation tools (very judiciously and only when warranted), I can spend more time listening. As a result, my posts and comments are now more relevant to what my network is interested in hearing from me. How do I know this? The number of comments I am receiving on my blog is increasing and the number of meaningful relationships within my social network is growing. |
I agree w/ your approach. Incorporating automation makes sense.
I agree w/ your approach. Incorporating automation makes sense.