Volume 3, Issue no. 1
New World Order Or Smoke and Mirrors?Almost immediately, a new class of marketing intelligentsia appeared to announce the new world order. Self styled social media marketing experts (almost any marketer with a Twitter account or Facebook page) preached that advertising no longer worked, that we should stop wasting money on advertising altogether and put all faith into social media, regardless of the lack of evidence that this would work.
Some bought this snake oil, willing to blindly trust an unproven channel simply because it was new, or viral, or free (which fit neatly into their new budgets). Others took a wait and see approach, unwilling to jeopardize their business with untested, unmeasured channels. And another group put social media to work as part of a bigger strategic plan, supported by the same rationales and resources of their conventional media channels. The next two years represented one of the great marketing experiments of our time, as social media was tried and tested, monitored and measured, and shaped to fit the business plans and visions of marketers around the world. Sound strategies and best practices still workToday, it’s clear that social media has not replaced advertising; but instead coexists quite peacefully with traditional media. Nor has social media leveled the playing field for most players. (In fact, it appears the big guys – with strong brands and the support of big advertising budgets – have achieved some of the greatest successes in social media channels.) We’ve explored social media marketing’s potential and sought success stories and best practices we could put to use for our clients. The greatest challenge was to find direct, measurable results to prove social media marketing can deliver a viable return on investment. In the January 2010 issue of the Wanderlust Report, “Using Social Media in Destination Marketing,” we reported on Queensland, Australia’s highly successful “Best Job In The World” campaign. The big takeaway was that social is just one aspect of an integrated marketing strategy, requiring traditional media spending for support and awareness. It’s another tool in the marketing toolbox – and just like you can’t build a house with one screwdriver, you can’t build a successful, multichannel marketing plan with a Twitter feed alone. So why is social media still the buzz of the marketing world?Even with its short comings, social media still holds promise and real opportunities for travel marketers. Having researched and experimented with social media, we have learned a great deal about its strengths and weaknesses as a marketing tool. What follows is some of our observations and lessons we can share with travel marketers. | ||
A note on Pepsi Refresh. In 2011 Pepsi Refresh is going to give more voting power to its to those who buy Pepsi products. Probably inside the caps or on the cans you'll see special codes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82mOYDHQLIU&feature=player_embedded
Thank you for this article/testimonial on social media. It is refreshing to read such a well written article that describes some of my own findings...
Congratulations. This one will be printed and saved. Kind regards Kathleen Bertier
It's kind of interesting to hear you guys bring up the economic aspect of it all because there's a lot of buzz in the hacker/startup communities about a potential tech bubble in the making; a lot of the VC/Angel funded software development of the moment is based at least partly in what could be considered social media, and a lot of it hasn't proven itself valuable with hard ROI yet, as you mentioned. (see Color - an in the moment photo sharing startup - which just got more money to get the ball rolling than Google did back when it was in the start-up stages: http://blogs.wsj.com/venturecapital/2011/03/24/sequoia-to-color-labs-not-since-google-have-we-seen-this/)
That being said, the numbers haven't really matched the dot-com bust, at least as far as I've read, but I'm no economist so my opinion on the situation is novice at best. Also, and maybe I'm wrong about this, but the dot-com bust was much more embedded in public funds than current investments are, and considering Facebook - the elephant in the room - is still private, as are most of the other big players (twitter being the number two), whether or not the these services go belly up is more Morgan Stanley's problem than the world's.
So why is this important to brand designers?
If most social media services are currently being funded in huge amounts based on (bad) speculation, and it turns out that these services aren't self sustainable, then when the bubble finally does pop, we, as brand people, are going to be left up the river without a paddle. No more money, means either no more insert-your-favorite-social-media-service-here or Facebook starts charging companies; either way, it's going to be turbulent considering how dependent some of us have become on it.
*that doesn't mean that Facebook doesn't provide value to brands, but if we're not paying them, and no one else is willing to, they go in the way of the Titanic.
All of this is especially the case when you consider what you guys mentioned in the article about a lot of people getting on board for the sake of being able to have buzz-words on their services-offered pages - not realizing that social media is a tool rather than a packet of Jack's magic beans. What are those people going to do if the bubble pops and people start charging? How do you value something that everyone says is priceless yet has been free for as long as you can remember?
...or maybe I'm just over thinking all this and everything is fine, which could totally be the case.
Good read, either way.
Another thing: right after I wrote this I ended up watching Zuckerberg's portion of last year's Web 2.0 Summit* and he mentioned something very interesting...
I think it's very obvious that there are people out there just jumping on the bandwagon, throwing all their chips in the social basket without properly understanding it; and being reserved in one's use of social media can be beneficial, especially in an era where it seems to be more fashion than substance. BUT, don't discount the significance of social media because there is a lot of PROVEN advantage to using it, albeit as far as my knowledge is concerned, mostly in tech companies (service based stuff); although, I don't see why these kind of trends can't propagate into the non-tech or less-tech markets.
So when I say proven, I'm talking tangible, measurable examples; the one's Zuckerberg used in his interview were flickr and google groups. Facebook came out with (comparably) sub-par competitors to both of these products, and in no time at all both became major contenders for their respective #1 titles; I'm pretty sure Facebook actually is the #1 photo sharing site now, and they only recently started supporting high-res images! Soo... it can only be attributed to the fact that being social is a more or equally important (and I'd argue, natural) component of a product/service than what the product actually offers in an isolated sense. that being said there are definitely exceptions; I don't really see how making Scott Toilet paper or Tide detergent social would work, let alone be effective. In that regard, that's the kind of distinction that I think your article alludes to people not making. Social is not an end-all-be-all, but there is a lot of unexploited power.
*http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Czw-dtTP6oU&feature=player_embedded
@Adam: Thanks for sharing your thoughts on social media as a marketing channel. Clearly, there are many opinions and perspectives, both pro and con, and a lot at stake for all of us – travel and tourism marketers, branding firms, the developers of social technology and investors alike.
Great article!
The success or otherwise of Social Media Marketing, like any marketing tool or channel, depends on creative and strategic application. The better you apply the tool and how it dovetails with your other channels, the more success (ROI) you will achieve.
www.ignitehospitality.com/blog/article/nothing-works-in-isolation
This statement brought it all home for me - "...leveraging the social power of ‘movements’ instead of direct marketing.