Skip navigation
Volume I | Issue no. 4

Tourism Without Branding

In a competitive landscape, lack of differentiation equals commodity.

There isn’t a commodity out there that gets to charge a premium--not one red cent more--unless there are no competitors. Commodities are complete substitutes. No one cares if you swap out one for another, because they’re all the same. There is little differentiation. A beach here is basically the same as a beach there. A lift and lodging deal here is the same as a deal over there.

Let’s say you’re in the lobby of a hotel, or at a rest stop,
or even surfing the web.

You happen upon a brochure (or website) for a ski resort. You flip through it. How much of it was truly unique? How much differentiation was created in your mind as you viewed it? Aside from a few facts about physical attributes, what popped off the page as truly unique? I’d bet you saw one or two money shots showing off the snow, a few more generic skiing and riding action shots, some lifestyle photographs and maybe a cute kid with a helmet and goggles, right?

Let’s use another example.

You pick up a travel magazine at your local newsstand, and page through it casually as you wait for a phone call, or sip coffee. It’s an issue about beach getaways. How many different ads will feature a photo of a woman, on a lounge chair, with a palm tree? It might surprise a lot of destination marketers to learn that a common response to ads like these is “Great. A Beach. So what?”

To make matters worse, online travel agencies, aggregators, and directory websites seem to have trained the consuming public to look for low price as the only driver of choice. The websites that people like to go to see how much it would cost to fly to Denver, or Miami aren’t in the business of helping create differentiation, or build a strong brand, or introduce a destination to a new audience. For them, it’s all about transaction volume.

The result? Lots of great deals for the consumer, but travel brands become uninteresting in a hurry if they’re not the cheapest deal.

Features and attributes are not meaningful points of differentiation
For those on the inside of the business, it’s especially important to see things from the consumers perspective. Many marketers take stock of the features or attributes they have to sell or promote, and attempt to create a brand position around them. The problem is that many of those attributes (a ski lift, a beach, a restaurant, activities for kids) aren’t all that unique. Lots of places have beaches, don’t they?

This is why creating differentiation within a particular sub-category is so vital to a strong competitive position, and can really drive preference, market share, and bottom line growth. 

[next]

Comments


Debra Dudley February 21, 2009 12:34 AM

what you are talking about can be said in one word authenticity -we all are looking for what is real about where we go - what is part of the culture - what the locals do - why they live here - not the same starbucks on every corner - what is real about where we are - we do not leave home to find home - not real travelers!! Tourists leave home to find home and want whats familiar - real travelers seek authenticity -we want to experience something very different from our usual day to day.
Mark Shipley February 21, 2009 9:30 AM

Authenticity is indeed what many travelers are looking for, but authenticity is a difficult concept to market and monetize. In marketing, "authenticity" has become a cliché -- much like the word "unique". If every destination is about "authenticity", authenticity becomes a commodity. And while your point about this difference between "real" travelers and tourists is interesting, most destinations need to appeal to both to have sustainable tourism business.
Simon McManus February 26, 2009 3:02 PM

Some good advice there. Working with operators and regional tourism offices in New Zealand, it's frustratingly obvious that some are the need to design a clear image, more then ignore their strategic marketing plans and many lack allegiance to their own brand image. When we deliver PR and e-marketing for out tourism clients it's essential to keep inline with greater brand objectives.
Melind DiPerna March 5, 2009 12:51 PM

Tourist may want familiar, and travelers may want authentic, but as a "lodging provider" we want them both. How then to market to both effectively is the question? Can we do both? Yes - if your destination and experience provide both. If it doesn't, then one must choose to market to the segment they can satisfy. It's just as important to know what you aren't as what you are. So if you are in a suburban 'hood near Disney that's cheap and big - that's ok, just as if it's ok if you are in a funky downtown loft in NYC...
Teresa Nelle March 7, 2009 12:25 AM

I enjoyed this article and the comments; yes I agree with "authenticity". But what about emphasizing the "cultural" aspect of the destination? For instance, I live on Maui, HI and I am working on incorporating information about the Hawaiian culture on my travel site; same thing with the other destinations in the South Pacific; people are interested in learning about different cultures and how they can experience them, teach their kids and have travel stories to take home to share with friends.
OKIA PAUL March 7, 2009 4:15 AM

first time to visit wanderlust but i am impressed by the content.

let me understand it further

info@worldhoteldirectory.us
Mark Shipley March 7, 2009 5:24 AM

Cultural aspects of a destination are important in defining a positioning. However, its important to remember that a destination's culture is merely a feature and that many destinations have culture to offer. Consumers ultimately want to know what the experience will be like (how will it be different than any other location) and how will it make me feel (meaningful high order benefit). When you can define and articulate these, you have the building blocks of a unique positioning.
toddkmeadows March 11, 2009 9:33 AM

Social Influence is of greater importance than most items you mentioned. Branding is shrinking as influence is growing. Influence the Influencers. It's not just friends now -- it's friendsters.
Mark Shipley March 11, 2009 11:06 AM

Simon and Okia, thanks for the comments.

Todd, I think you are confusing the idea of branding with the practice of mass media advertising. They are not interchangeable. Advertising is one tactic used in branding, sociaI influence is another. I agree with you that social influence is growing in importance and that influencing the influencers is becoming more important every day — due to the growth in online social networking. But to say that positive social influencers aren't practicing brand advocacy would be inaccurate. They may not view themselves as participants in the branding process, but they are nevertheless. Since a brand has always been what consumers think it is and not always what a company wants it to be, social influence is the purest form of branding.
vincent bouyra March 18, 2009 3:51 PM

Talking about positionning is from the very past of marketing. It talks to the "reason side" of the consumer and help him to make its own conclusion. But conclusion won' t make him act. "While reason drives you to conclusions, emotions drive you to act". The way to market any product is to think on relations with consumer. And make that relation based on love. Tourism is the best, the most complicated and the most exciting category to manage. Almost every place can introduce a love relationship.
Mark Shipley March 18, 2009 4:45 PM

Vincent,it is true that in the past (and unfortunately the present) marketers have tried to position brands to appeal to the "reason side." If you take another read of this newsletter and poke around our site, you'll find that we are proponents of positioning to appeal to the emotional side of the consumer. Appealing to reason is not, nor has ever been a sustainable as a point of differentiation.


Tony Humphrey March 19, 2009 12:32 PM

Some solid info...needs time to take it all in...am trying hard! tony
Herman van Bon March 22, 2009 2:45 PM

Quote: "Once that truth has been uncovered and clearly articulated, every decision that has to be made gets a lot easier moving forward".
That's just where the problems come in for tourist destinations which still have to be discovered. In our experience here in South Africa it seems that the majority of (inbound) tour operators are not very much into exploration of new destinations. They choose the safe 'mainstream' destinations ......
Despite economic recession and the impact of this on the tourism industry we offer since a few years together with a few partners package deals; mainly via direct marketing towards our target markets. Result: 50% increase in bookings in comparison with last year. Majority via direct (online) bookings. The travel industry in South Africa did not see the potential of our idea when we started it. Now we are branding the Klaas Voogds area in the Western Cape as the only 'self sufficient' destination between Cape Town and Garden Route; the best (hand crafted) wine from the Robertson Wine Valley are "original Klaas Voogds", there is a game drive with only indigenous game (no zoo Big 5), two of the best restaurants plus private dining, a nature reserve, 4x4 track, angling spots, massages, the world's largest hedge maze, unique succulent gardens, olive tasting, taxidermist demonstrations, wire art, woodwork, candle making, etc. etc.
And guests are spreading the word at home never to book an organised trip to South Africa but to go on a self discovery tour instead of being guided from one tourist trap into another ....
Branding is useful but it can work against you when tourists find out that they are fooled .....
We choose very concious for long term branding with integrity! This pays off at the end.

Mark O'Brien May 1, 2009 12:34 PM

P.S. I also noticed that you're Google ranking for all of the page titles used in this article is pretty close to perfect. Nice job.
  
';